Indonesia cargo ship at sea
Discovery
Jan 10, 2025

Indonesia and China: How Trade Became a Path to Poverty Reduction

A new study from The Center for Indonesian Policy Studies (CIPS) shows that trade can be a powerful tool for poverty reduction when paired with inclusive policies addressing regional and social inequalities.


By Deasy Pane and Natanael Waraney Gerald Massie

Research shows that international trade influences various economic agents, which, in turn, impact indicators of human flourishing. 

With TWCF funding, the Center for Indonesian Policy Studies (CIPS) aims to bridge the gap in understanding trade's social and regional impacts in Indonesia through a series of five econometric studies.

We asked Deasy Pane of CIPS and National Development Planning Agency and Natanael Waraney Gerald Massie of Universitas Indonesia to share findings from the study they led as part of this series.

A Tale of Two Liberalization Episodes with China - Working Paper

EXPLORE KEY TAKEAWAYS FROM THE STUDY BELOW; DOWNLOAD THE FULL WORKING PAPER HERE.


A Transformative Trade Relationship

Over recent decades, Indonesia has experienced a major shift in its trade relationships, particularly with China. As a developing nation rich in resources and a diverse workforce, Indonesia's economic health has always been closely tied to international trade. Our research set out to explore how increased trade with China has affected poverty levels across Indonesia, focusing on two key milestones: China's entry into the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2001 and the ASEAN-China Free Trade Agreement (ACFTA) in 2010.

Supported by the Templeton World Charity Foundation, we delved into how these pivotal moments have shaped Indonesia's economy and what lessons they offer for developing countries around the world. Our findings reveal a nuanced story of progress and challenges, showing how trade can be a powerful tool for poverty reduction when paired with the right policies.

Why Trade and Poverty Are Deeply Connected in Indonesia

Trade isn't just about numbers and tariffs; it directly impacts people's lives, especially in a sprawling country like Indonesia. With over 270 million people spread across more than 17,000 islands, reducing poverty is a complex task. For many Indonesians, particularly in rural areas, economic opportunities are limited. This is where trade steps in. When Indonesia trades with a major economy like China, it can lead to:

  • Cheaper Goods: Imported raw materials and consumer products become more affordable, improving purchasing power.
  • More Jobs: Growing businesses that engage in international trade create new employment opportunities.
  • Economic Growth: Exposure to global markets pushes industries to become more productive and competitive. It also opens opportunities for exports.

Given Indonesia's unique geography and economic diversity, understanding how trade impacts poverty in different regions helps policymakers design strategies to ensure everyone benefits.

Indonesia's trade with China 1996-2022

“Trade isn't just about numbers and tariffs; it directly impacts people's lives.”

Two Key Milestones: China’s WTO Entry and the ACFTA

To grasp the impact of trade on poverty, we focused on two major events in the trade relationship between Indonesia and China:

  • China’s WTO Accession in 2001: Joining the WTO meant China agreed to lower tariffs and open its markets. For Indonesia, this facilitated easier access to the Chinese market and the import of cheaper Chinese products.
  • The ASEAN-China Free Trade Agreement (ACFTA) in 2010: This agreement further reduced tariffs between ASEAN countries and China to nearly zero, significantly boosting trade flows.

Following ACFTA, trade between Indonesia and China surged, with imports and exports reaching new heights. By 2022, China accounted for nearly 29% of Indonesia’s imports and 23% of its exports. These milestones created opportunities but also challenges. While trade expanded, it raised important questions: Did this growth in trade help reduce poverty in Indonesia? And if so, how?

Indonesia export of commodities to China
The Dynamic Between Trade and Poverty Reduction

Our research revealed a clear connection between increased trade with China and poverty reduction in Indonesia. But how exactly did trade help lift people out of poverty? The answer lies in the types of goods traded and the regions involved.

  • Cheaper Imports of Raw Materials and Inputs: Indonesian businesses benefited greatly from importing cheaper raw materials and intermediate goods from China. These lower costs helped businesses become more productive and competitive. As these businesses grew, they created more jobs and paid higher wages, helping more people escape poverty.
  • Uneven Impact of Trade: Not all regions benefited equally. Urban areas with better infrastructure, education, and literacy rates were able to capitalize on trade opportunities more effectively. However, even in rural areas with lower literacy rates, we saw reductions in the depth and severity of poverty. While fewer people in these areas fully escaped poverty, their incomes improved, narrowing the poverty gap.
  • Boosting Economic Growth through Increased Exports: Manufacturing regions benefited from cheaper inputs, boosting productivity and creating jobs. Some regions supplying raw materials to China also saw improvements, driven by higher demand for their goods.
Challenges and Unintended Consequences

While trade liberalization brought many benefits, it also came with challenges. Some industries struggled to compete with cheaper Chinese imports, leading to job losses in certain sectors. Additionally, regions with lower education and literacy levels couldn't fully harness the opportunities presented by increased trade. 

This uneven benefit distribution underscores an important point: Trade alone isn't enough to reduce poverty. Indonesia needs supportive policies to help workers and businesses adapt to competition and change.

Applied tariff data between China and Indonesia (in percentage)

“Trade alone isn't enough to reduce poverty. Indonesia needs supportive policies to help workers and businesses adapt to competition and change.”

Policy Recommendations: Optimizing Trade To Reduce Poverty

To enhance the poverty-reducing effects of trade, our research suggests the following policy actions:


1. Investing in Education and Literacy
Education and literacy play a crucial role in ensuring that more people can take advantage of economic opportunities arising from trade. Regions with higher levels of education and literacy have benefited the most from increased trade in terms of poverty reduction. Therefore, it is imperative to invest in educational programs that focus on improving literacy rates, vocational training, and skills development. These programs should aim to equip the workforce with the necessary skills to meet the demands of a globalized economy, thereby enabling more individuals to secure better-paying jobs and improve their standards of living.


2. Improving Infrastructure
Infrastructure development is essential for enabling rural areas to participate more effectively in international trade. Better roads, ports, and communication networks can reduce transportation costs, increase market access, and facilitate the efficient movement of goods and services. When rural areas are better connected, they can tap into new markets and economic opportunities, helping to spread the benefits of trade more evenly across different regions. Infrastructure improvements also contribute to the overall economic growth of a country by enhancing productivity and competitiveness.


3. Promoting Inclusive Trade Policies
Inclusive trade policies are essential for ensuring that small businesses, farmers, and marginalized groups benefit from trade agreements. Providing financial support, training, and market access to these groups can help spread the benefits of trade more widely and reduce regional disparities. Inclusive policies should aim to promote equitable economic development by ensuring that all segments of society have the opportunity to participate in and benefit from international trade. This can help create a more inclusive and resilient economy that is better equipped to handle global challenges.


4. Enhancing Social Protection Programs
Strengthening social protection programs can help mitigate the adverse effects of trade liberalization on vulnerable populations. Social safety nets, such as unemployment benefits and targeted assistance programs, can provide a cushion for those affected by economic transitions. These programs are crucial for supporting individuals and families during periods of economic change, ensuring that they have access to essential services and resources. By enhancing social protection, we can create a more robust safety net that helps vulnerable populations navigate the challenges of a globalized economy.


5. Fostering Public-Private Partnerships
Collaboration between the government and the private sector is vital for driving economic growth and development. Public-private partnerships can leverage the strengths of both sectors to promote innovation, infrastructure development, and job creation. By working together, governments and businesses can develop and implement policies that support sustainable economic growth and inclusive development. These partnerships can also help mobilize resources and expertise to address complex economic challenges and create a more dynamic and competitive economy.


Global Lessons: Indonesia’s Experience and the Future of Trade

Indonesia's experience with trade liberalization offers valuable lessons for other developing countries. From the study, we can see that the impact of trade is not one dimensional where regions with different traits are impacted differently. For example, regions with higher education rate benefit more from trade liberalization.

Trade can be a powerful tool for poverty reduction, but only if it is paired with inclusive policies addressing regional and social inequalities. Our study highlights the importance of investing in education, infrastructure, and supportive policies to ensure that trade benefits everyone, not just a select few.

In the global discussion on trade and development, Indonesia's story serves as a reminder that trade policies need to be carefully designed to promote not just economic growth, but shared prosperity. With the right strategies, trade can transform lives, reduce poverty, and build a more prosperous future for all.

The implications of Indonesia's experience extend beyond its borders. As countries around the world seek to harness the benefits of trade, they must consider the lessons learned from Indonesia. Trade policies should prioritize inclusivity, equity, and sustainability, ensuring that economic growth translates into tangible improvements in people's lives.


Conclusion

Trade liberalization between Indonesia and China has brought both opportunities and challenges. While increased trade has contributed to poverty reduction and economic growth, it has also highlighted the need for supportive policies to address regional disparities and ensure inclusive development. By investing in education, infrastructure, and social protection programs, Indonesia can maximize the benefits of trade and build a more equitable and prosperous society.

As the global economy continues to evolve, the lessons from Indonesia's trade experience can inform the development of trade policies that promote shared prosperity. With a commitment to inclusive growth and equitable development, trade can become a powerful force for positive change, lifting millions out of poverty and creating a brighter future for all.